On Monday, we briefly touched on the idea of few
characters actually having “freedom” in the novel, with the excepting being
(perhaps) Paddy. Everybody is always being bossed around or is doing something
for someone else’s benefit, as long as they are being observed (and,
considering most of this story revolves around dialogue, they are being
observed almost constantly. But if they are not being watched by an authority
figure, they won’t necessarily be doing their jobs. Paddy is a loner, no one
(spare Kate) can understand him, so he kind of does his own thing – he’s seen
sleeping in the middle of the day. We hinted at his lack of speech as being the
key to this freedom, but I think there is another excepting: little Albert. Except
he’s always being told what to do literally all the time. However, he still
manages to be seen as the rebel in the piece, nobody can successfully defy him
or tell him what to do – especially not those damn peacocks. He just says “Yes’m”
and carries on with his plan of action. And Lil Albert gets to have an active
part in the novel (we see him more than we see Paddy, at least). I don’t think
it’s the lack of communication that gives these two characters freedom – I think
it’s a lack of respect. They are both very low in the hierarchy of the castle –
Paddy because he’s Irish and Albert because he’s young and seen as rebellious.
But without anyone to respect them, they have no reason to do what would
normally be expected of them – because everyone’s expectations are already so
low.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.