Tommy’s stoicism
and careful mannerisms seem to contrast with the undercurrent of chaos and the
inevitable “cracking open” to which Anna continually alludes. Such bodily and psychological
entrapment, however, points toward a potential unraveling, or at the very
least, an instability inherent in his nature. He appears detached, not meeting the gaze of the others and
is described as “closely-welded” (32), suggesting a gluing together of
something that is broken or, at the very least, revealing the existence of
separate parts. Separation, for
Tommy, seems to be the way in which he maintains control: “His mouth moved in the act of eating
as it did in the act of speaking, every word separate, each berry whole and
separate” (33). This separation
indicates both fission (the need to “weld”) and wholeness or integrity (“each
berry whole and separate”). Tommy’s
surprising power over the others (“He’s bullying us all” says Anna) in the
scene on pages 33-39 is fueled by his perceived “blindness” and “silence”—traditional
indicators of an inability to assert the gaze and to communicate. Tommy doesn’t want to be defined by an
action, suggesting his search for stability and order (an identity not based on
something that can be taken away from him). He does, indeed, seem to have many of the same preoccupations
as Anna, but perhaps his “silence” (in contrast to Anna’s writing/creation in
the form of the notebooks) will ultimately lead to his “cracking open.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.