Monday, September 3, 2012

Metaphor: Liquids and Containers



            In the chapter “Death and Love”, the reader sees two scenes between Gerald and Gudrun demonstrating their relationship, both of which use similar metaphors. The first scene takes place around page 331 of the Penguin addition: “…[Gerald] seemed to be gathering [Gudrun] into himself…drinking in the suffusion of her physical being, avidly. He lifted her, and seemed to pour her into himself, like wine into a cup.” The metaphor continues in the next couple of paragraphs, with Gudrun as the liquid and Gerald as the container.
            The next scene takes place on page 344 of the Penguin edition. Unlike in the first scene, this scene has Gerald operating as the liquid and Gudrun as the cup. “Into her he poured all his pent-up darkness and corrosive death, and he was whole again…. And she, subject, received him as a vessel filled with his bitter potion of death.”
            In both sections, the person becoming liquid is, in a way, losing control. They’re allowing more base emotions to dominate them at these moments. The one who is a liquid is allowing themselves to be shaped by the person who is a container, allowing their form to follow that lead. The pouring also suggests a loose of boundaries; in the case of Gudrun, she surrenders her restraint and allows herself to be swept away by Gerald. In the case of the later scene, Gerald allows his own restraint to disappear, but Gudrun is less willing. In any case, I found the parallels interesting, especially considering that the roles were switched around in the different scenes.

2 comments:

  1. I don't know if I agree with Gerald losing control in the second liquid/container scene. It seemed more like he was ridding himself of these negative emotions and making Gudrun take it all. I mean, you're not really in control when receiving someone else's hateful emotions are you? At least, that's how I saw it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Caitlin, I think that is a fair point. However, I think that maybe putting that scene in terms of dependance as a loss of control might offer a way to see Gerald's behavior as a loss of control. By depending on Gudrun to take all his "corrosive death" he is giving up the absolute control he desires to have.

    To put it in terms of Birkin's star equilibrium concept. Gerald is compromising his distinct solar sovereignty by pouring unstable parts of his solar mass into Gudrun rather than forming a equilibrium with her.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.