When we set out to answer the initial questions the first day of
class, I was sure what to anticipate. Questions like can be mad? Or what does
it mean for a novel to be insane or obtain insane/mad qualities. "Mad"
and "insane" conveyed a sense of urgency and chaos--I was afraid that
I would be frantically trying to
force a meaning that could somehow satisfy or answer the ambiguity of these
questions and, through this process, become distracted from the larger claims, ideas,
and overall feeling of the text. So, I focused on the feeling of the text and
discovered—at least for myself—it isn’t necessarily that the text itself is
mad, rather the deceptive structure and repetition of perplexing reading
processes that makes us mad, though I’d liked to propose deceptive or fun comparable
to this maddening reading experience. Although I did feel rather anxious while
reading Crash, I felt the entirely
opposite feeling in novels like Never Let
Me Go, Molloy. In these novels, while of course trying to make meaning, I
almost always found myself transforming my readerly experience into that of a
game; hunting for clues and trying to solve, understand my position or
relationship to the text before the end; unfortunately, the structure of Molloy and Never Let Me Go directly attacked this desire order, structures, and
linear narrative progression/drive. In
this way, narrative structure/narrative dive--the way the author or narrator
thwarted our perhaps more conventional expectations for a beginning, middle,
and an end. I became intrigued how a novel could make us so keen/aware of our
positions as readers while also take advantage of our desire for the novel's end
as a motivating force behind the mockery. In other words, I grew fascinated by
the simultaneous distance and closeness I felt to various characters. For
example, I could lose myself forever in the re-reading of Never Let Me Go in hopes I could
somehow, this time understand/construct a completely vision or picture of the
novel's "atmosphere". It is this very notion of repetition--my
impulsive confidence in thinking I am so close to unlocking, uncovering, or
discovering some hidden truth and meaning in one of these text that I would
characterize as manic. This repetitive mode of mania defamiliarizes the
familiar and traps us in a cycle of consistently altering perspectives. I think
we see the importance of patterns of perspective in Molloy; I enjoyed the task of having to construct a perception of a
seemingly “mad” Molloy first and then close with Moran's seemingly more
navigable method of narration. Although frustrating at times, Molloy's backward
structure revealed my tendency to constantly make associations in an
attempt to make meaning. These revelations are now forcing me to questions the
authenticity of my interpretations; is there an original or organic way I read?
Or are all my ways of reading --meaning my expectations, rituals, or
categorizing-- original or organic? Or am I a product of various narrators,
plots, or familiar scenes with characters from other literary world?
Similarly, in Never Let Me Go, I experienced a sense of almost relief when I
realized I was responsible for constructing a perception or vision of the book
out already deconstructed plot outcome. I guess for me,
"experimental" --the mad or insane emotions of a novel--exist within
the novel but require our participation to develop, transform, or release. I’ve
never before been made so aware of how I
read while simultaneously be so involved and lost in a text; it’s like I
inhabited both spaces at once—a literal internal existence within the pages of
the novel while always checking back-- or perhaps an entire new space was created resulting from the
themes of these clever texts. Instead of making meaning from chaos, I found the
most meaningful experiences reading to be chaotic; although the endings of Molloy and Never Let Me Go signaled the end of the novel, I found myself immediately
flipping to the beginning to re-read and moments later put the book down in
fear I may know more than I initially thought. Back and forth, close and further
away—the ebb and flow, pace, and pattern of these texts. A heartbeat of
maddening, chaotic, insanity!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.