We’ve talked a lot about the
fluidity of perspective, of the chameleon quality of Berkin, and of the
“decentralization” of both Berkin and Hermione. I’m going to depart from this notion of the fluidity of narrative
and self to examine more closely the relationship between Gudrun and
Gerald. Both these characters seem
interested in completing and “fixing” things—which contrasts with the
continually changing and evolving notion of self that Berkin and (I would
argue) Ursula demonstrate. At the
beginning of the novel, Gudrun watches people with “objective curiosity,” and
sees them as “subjects in a picture” . . . as a “finished creation.” “She loved to recognize their various
characteristics, to place them in their true light . . . settle them forever . .
. She knew them, they were finished, sealed and stamped and finished with, for
her” (8). This finality of
language indicates Gudrun’s fixation on completion. Even though Gudrun yearns for the “fluidity [of the water]”
(46) when she sees Gerald swimming, she claims she cannot attain such a desire
due to her gender (47). Unable to realize this desire, Gudrun
instead becomes associated with the rigidity of the plants (in her
sketching—pg. 111) that grow in the fluid medium whose very form she
desires. Whereas Berkin uses art
to understand the world around him—Gudrun exhibits her control through her
artistic expression.
Gerald
expresses similar goals of production and completion during his conversation
with Berkin on the train—claiming that he live[s] “to work, to produce
something” (46). Associated with
the material and the mechanistic, Gerald was “bound to strive to come up to her
[Gudrun’s] criterion, fulfill her idea of a man and a human being” (95). This conflation of idea/fulfillment
(intangible) with “criterion” (something fixed and goal-oriented) indicates
that Gerald’s way of seeking the intangible is through tangible means (having a
criterion/method to guide him).
Thus, in “Sketchbook,” when their “bond was established” (finality of
language) over water (a fluid medium), Gerald and Gudrun demonstrate that the
outward manifestation of their relationship is one of control (Gudrun puts
Gerald in his place—“their was a body of cold power in her . . . [her spirit]
was finished” just as Gerald exerted control over the mare). However, the image of the surrounding
water over which this bond is established illustrates the possibility of
fluidity (maybe just in their subconscious desires—ie: class fluidity—they
traverse these societal boundaries in the subconscious realm).
Note: I have a different edition . . . add 7-8 to each page number for the edition on the syllabus. =)
Intriguing thoughts--ones which I think will be borne out by later events. You might think, too, in light of your reading, of Gudrun's response when the sketchbook falls in the water: the potential erasure or at least immersion into fluidity of the sketches doesn't alter their use to her. Fixity indeed.
ReplyDelete